The United States imposed punitive tariffs on solar panel imports from China, the latest in a series of trade disputes between the world’s two biggest economies and sparking accusations by Beijing of protectionism.
The new tariffs of 30 per cent, much bigger than had been expected, were set on Thursday by the U.S. Commerce Department after it ruled in favour of local firms which said the Chinese exporters were dumping cut-price solar panels on their market.
The size of the tariffs is larger than Chinese companies had expected and some analysts said it might prompt them to manufacture elsewhere or look for alternative markets.
“The U.S. decision lacks fairness, and China expresses its strong displeasure,” a spokesman for China’s Ministry of Commerce, Shen Danyang, said in a statement posted on the ministry’s website.
“By deliberately provoking trade friction in the clean energy sector, the U.S. is sending the world a negative signal about trade protectionism,” Mr. Shen said.
However, Beijing stopped short of threatening immediate retaliation.
“We believe these measures by the United States damage China-U.S. cooperation in the renewable and clean energy sectors, and also damage U.S. interests. We hope the United States can appropriately resolve the relevant issues, and take practical steps to respond to China’s demands,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said.
The tariffs apply to most top Chinese exporters, including Suntech Power Holdings Co Ltd. and Trina Solar Ltd. , at about 31 per cent.
The ruling follows a complaint filed last October by the U.S. subsidiary of Germany’s SolarWorld AG, and six other U.S. companies that alleged unfair competition and had sought duties well above 100 per cent.
China’s solar companies hold more than 60 per cent of the global market. The U.S. market alone accounts for about 20 per cent of sales of China’s largest solar panel manufacturers.
Their heavy reliance on subsidized U.S. and European markets has prompted criticism that loans from Chinese state-run banks and low prices gave the companies an unfair advantage.
Under the decision, 59 Chinese solar companies that petitioned Washington in the case will also face an import duty of about 31 per cent, including Yingli Green Energy, LDK Solar, Canadian Solar, Hanwha solar One , JA Solar Holding and Jinko Solar.
Other Chinese companies could now face a 250 per cent tariff, although those levels could be altered before the final ruling is issued by the Commerce Department in the coming months.
The U.S. ruling, retroactive to cover imports dating back 90 days, comes two months after Washington set more modest tariffs of less than 5 per cent on imports from China because of what it deemed Beijing’s unfair support for its solar industry.
Suntech, the world’s largest manufacturer of solar panels, which also operates a panel plant in Arizona, denied it sold below its cost of production.
“All leading companies in the global solar industry want to see a trade war averted. We need more competition and innovation, not litigation,” Andrew Beebe, Suntech’s chief commercial officer, said in a statement.
Yingli Energy and Trina Solar said they would actively defend their position in administrative proceedings.
There was speculation that Chinese companies could circumvent the restrictions by buying Taiwan cells and wafers for panels and assembling them outside the mainland.
“This is positive for Taiwanese players, which can come in and supply solar cells to U.S. panel makers that won’t be buying from the Chinese,” said Keith Li, analyst at CIMB Research.
Chinese companies had been bracing for a punitive duty of 15 per cent, analysts said. Some have already started to look for markets beyond Europe and the U.S.
“By late last year, we started shifting our focus away from the United States and into other growth markets like Japan,” said Solargiga Energy chief financial officer Jason Chow. “Japan has started offering attractive incentives for solar.”
The U.S. market accounted for more over 10 per cent of Solargiga’s sales in 2011.
President Barack Obama, running for re-election in November, has promised to crack down on what he said were unfair Chinese trade practices.
Chinese officials have threatened to impose trade duties on U.S. shipments of polysilicon, the key material used in solar panels, if the U.S. moved to penalize Chinese solar companies.
“The anti-dumping ruling increases the risk of retaliatory action by Chinese government on U.S. polysilicon imports into China,” a Deutsche Bank analyst said in a report.
Solar panel prices have tumbled more than half since the beginning of 2011 amid a supply glut triggered by declining subsidies in Europe and rapid global growth in the production capacity of solar wafers, cells and panels.