Skip to main content

Russell Girling, president & CEO of TransCanada, meets with The Globe and Mail editorial board on May 13, 2014.Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The CEO of TransCanada Corp. says he doesn't see the oil industry's appetite for new pipelines faltering even though crude prices have skidded recently to the lowest in more than five-years.

In an interview in his downtown Calgary office, Russ Girling said he's seen ups and downs far more drastic over his career and expects the oil patch will come out of the latest downturn in reasonably good shape.

"There's a tremendous need to build irrespective of the price of the commodity right now," Girling said.

"We're being pressed to get these facilities on line as quickly as we possibly can."

U.S. benchmark crude has fallen by nearly half over the past six months, settling at $56.47 (U.S.) a barrel on Wednesday. In recent weeks, there has been a bevy of announcements signalling that next year's activity in the oil patch will be subdued.

Girling said most in the industry would see an $80 to $100 per barrel oil price in the long run, given that demand will continue to grow.

And he points out that when TransCanada first filed its application for Keystone XL in September, 2008, it wasn't exactly a good time for the oil patch, either. After hitting record highs during that summer, crude prices swiftly cratered below $40 a barrel as the Great Recession took hold.

"I'm not saying this is easy at all, but the business is resilient and the world is demanding more oil every day," said Girling. He said anyone who believes that US$60 oil – even if it's for a year or two – is going to cause the oil sands to come to a screeching halt "hasn't been in this business very long."

"So the notion that somehow as we hit this new low that this business is over in Canada, I think one only needs to look at the last 30 years of production to say that theory doesn't work."

TransCanada has been waiting on a permit to build its Keystone XL pipeline for more than six years. The $8-billion project would carry crude from Alberta and the U.S. Midwest to refineries near the Gulf Coast.

Keystone XL would cut diagonally across Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. The most recent hold-up has centred around a court case in Nebraska over who has the authority to approve the pipeline's route through the state.

Opposition to Keystone XL has been focused on local concerns, such as a potential spill's impact on a key aquifer, as well as on broader issues, such as the pipeline's role in enabling oil sands growth the resulting increase in greenhouse gas emissions.

Because the pipeline would cross the Canada-U.S. border, it requires presidential approval. So far, President Barack Obama has declined to make a decision.

Report an editorial error

Report a technical issue

Tickers mentioned in this story

Study and track financial data on any traded entity: click to open the full quote page. Data updated as of 28/03/24 0:06pm EDT.

SymbolName% changeLast
TRP-N
TC Energy Corp
+0.73%39.93
TRP-T
TC Energy Corp
+0.43%54.03

Interact with The Globe